NPPA Discouraged by SCOTUS Continued Refusal to Allow Cameras in Its Courtroom

March 25th, 2014 by Mickey Osterreicher and tagged , , , , , , ,

Unfortunately the U.S. Supreme Court continues to refuse to change its position on cameras in its courtroom.  The Coalition for Court Transparency recently sent a letter to the Chief Justice requesting him to reconsider the High Court’s longstanding policy barring audio-visual coverage of its proceedings. The Court’s Public Information Officer timely responded by saying “there are no plans to change the Court’s current practices” whereby they will continue to make audio recordings of all oral arguments available on the Court’s website “at the end of each argument week” and written transcripts of those arguments “on the same day the argument is heard.” r

NPPA Executive Director Charles W.L. (“Chip”) Deale, reacted to the Court’s letter by stating, “NPPA is grateful that the Supreme Court at least showed the courtesy of responding to a letter from the Coalition for Court Transparency (of which NPPA is a member) calling for cameras to be allowed during Court proceedings. However, the Court’s continued intransigence on this important issue is highly discouraging and, NPPA believes, a disservice to American citizens.  Via the Coalition, NPPA will continue to advocate for greater transparency by the Court.”

Responding for the Coalition, Bruce Brown of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, to whom the court’s letter was addressed, said: “I am appreciative that the Supreme Court responded to our coalition’s letter. I do believe that the smallest of changes to the court’s institutional practices would increase the public’s understanding of and appreciation for the court’s work. I hope that this marks the beginning of a dialogue between the court and those of us who care deeply about press freedom and increasing transparency at our most important judicial institution.”

Mike Cavender, RTDNA Executive Director said, “RTDNA is very disappointed in the Supreme Court’s reluctance to even consider further our request to provide more transparency,” added .  “We firmly believe the actions taken by the Court are of sufficient importance and impact to all Americans to warrant providing video coverage of the arguments the Justices hear.”

As the Coalition stated in its letter to Chief Justice Roberts, “we believe the Supreme Court should embrace contemporary expectations of transparency by public officials and allow the recording and broadcast of its courtroom proceedings. Following Justice John Marshall Harlan’s concurrence in Estes v. Texas (1965), we believe the ‘day’ has long since passed ‘when television [has] become so commonplace an affair in the daily life of the average person as to dissipate all reasonable likelihood that its use in courtrooms may disparage the judicial process.’”

Posted in Access, Cameras in the Courtroom, Coalition for Court Transparency, First Amendment, First Amendment rights, National Press Photographers Association, NPPA, Open Government, OpenSCOTUS, photographers, Photographers' Rights, photojournalism, SCOTUS, US Supreme Court | 13 Comments »

13 Responses to “NPPA Discouraged by SCOTUS Continued Refusal to Allow Cameras in Its Courtroom”

  1.   Vance Cadrette Says:

    Content birthday mother Morris, Wishing you superior overall health and happiness… And thank you for presenting us Arthur… loads of like from India. Regards,br /Kiran

  2.   Party Dresses Says:

    Hello, i think that i saw you visited my blog thus i came to

  3.   odchudzanie w ciazy Says:

    My developer is trying to persuade me to move to .net from PHP. I have always disliked the idea because of the expenses. But he’s tryiong none the less. I’ve been using WordPress on various websites for about a year and am concerned about switching to another platform. I have heard excellent things about Is there a way I can transfer all my wordpress content into it? Any kind of help would be really appreciated!

  4. Says:

    One measurement generally is not plenty of as glitches may take place when executing measurement. If calculated blood strain is significant that does not suggest that you have hypertension, unless it is a pretty high value. The diagnosis of substantial blood pressure is commonly based mostly on many measurements in a specified time interval (for case in point several measurements within just a week, every single day at the same time). Considering the fact that elevated blood force does not

  5.   Real Estate Listings Says:

    Utterly written articles , thankyou for entropy.

  6.   Anonymous Says:

    Hi there would you mind stating which blog platform you’re working with? I’m looking to start my own blog in the near future but I’m having a hard time making a decision between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal. The reason I ask is because your layout seems different then most blogs and I’m looking for something unique. P.S My apologies for getting off-topic but I had to ask!

  7.   Loriann Shimsky Says:

    Hello Kit, you are very ideal, looks like the Vauxhall agent did superior business enterprise in Central London. All those cars are parked while in the middle on the street for sure, several on the wide streets in that section of London allowed these kinds of parking, and nevertheless do whilst these days you may have to pay (with the nose) for it. Is an expression in use in Usa?

  8.   Gift Cards Says:

    I loved as much as you’ll receive carried out right here. The sketch is attractive, your authored material stylish. nonetheless, you command get got an nervousness over that you wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come further formerly again since exactly the same nearly a lot often inside case you shield this hike.

  9.   view publisher site Says:

    I don’t even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was good. I do not know who you are but definitely you’re going to a famous blogger if you aren’t already ;) Cheers!|

  10.   Leveraging Ebooks Success Says:


  11.   House Plans Says:

    hey there and thank you for your info

  12.   Floor Plans Says:

    Heya i

  13.   mike Says:

    What your kind seem totally unaware you don’t really know, isthat it’s NOTLEE IACOCCA. It can only be hoped, nevertheless, that whomever you choose to send, if anybody, will agree to abide by his own formally-theoretical standards, by leaving all mere”subjective emotionalism” (particularly, his own twistedly-degenerate versions EVEN of such) and vulgar displays of physical force behind; despite thefact that it would be so much less personally convenient,within such an un-pseudo-academically-well-insulated context, with its RHETORICALLY STACKED DECK of conveniently “self-evident truths,” for him to do so.Last Friday, 2 billion people witnessed Catherine Middletonglide down the aisle to music that prophesied of a timewhen Jesus Christ will return and then rule from Jerusalem.

Leave a Reply