NYPD Return Seized Camera Equipment of N.Y. Times Photographer

August 13th, 2012 by Justice Warren and tagged , , , , , ,

The New York Police Department (NYPD) on Friday returned the camera equipment of a New York Times photographer who had his equipment seized following his arrest on August 4th.

Robert Stolarik, who was arrested on charges of obstructing governmental administration and resisting arrest while photographing police activity on assignment, said, “My cameras were returned to me on Friday at 3:30. Getting my gear back is the first step in returning to some normalcy. The next things for me will be getting the charges dropped and having my credentials returned to me.”

The return of the seized equipment came days after the National Press Photographers Association (NPPA) sent a letter to Deputy Commissioner Paul J. Browne of the NYPD that objected to the rough treatment and arrest of Stolarik and requested that his equipment be returned to him.

“Mr. Stolarik’s equipment and credentials must be returned immediately,” said Mickey H. Osterreicher, general counsel for NPPA, in his letter to the NYPD.  “We believe that the seizure and alleged destruction of his equipment not only violates his First, Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights but may be considered a form of prior restraint and a violation of the Privacy Protection Act of 1980, specifically enacted to protect against the search and seizure of a journalist’s work product.”

Osterreicher also sent a letter to the editor  which was published by the NY Times on that same Friday morning, in which among other things, the NPPA attorney urged “the New York Police Department to work with us to improve training and supervision for its members starting from the top down .”

Upon learning of the equipment’s return Osterreicher said, “While I am pleased that Robert has his cameras back, this incident, like so many others around the country should never have happened in the first place.” “Had officers just let him do his job this would be a non-story,” he added.

Today Stolarik met with officers from the NYPD Internal Affairs Bureau, who were following up on his complaint. That is also the reason that word of the equipment return was not announced until now. George Freeman, a lawyer for The Times, said “we hope the IAB will objectively investigate this case, because we are fully confident that if they look at the facts, they will find that the officers who blocked, intimidated and assaulted Mr. Stolarik acted inappropriately and violated NYPD guidelines.” He also added, “we hope that those officers ultimately will be disciplined not only to punish them for their wrongdoing, but also to send a well-needed message to the rest of the force that interfering and beating on the press while they are doing their jobs simply won’t be tolerated.”

Posted in Access, Assault on Photographers, Attack Photographers, Cameras, DCPI Paul Browne, First Amendment, Legal, National Press Photographers Association, New York TImes, News Photography, Newsgathering, photographers, Photographers' Rights, photojournalism, Robert Stolarik | 9 Comments »

9 Responses to “NYPD Return Seized Camera Equipment of N.Y. Times Photographer”

  1.   Mark Kalan Says:

    Disciplined: what a laugh – they’ll get a month suspension with pay and go to the Bahamas. They should be fired and lose their pensions/benefits; there is a long waiting line for men and women who WANT to be NYPD members in good standing!

  2.   Ronald de Groot Says:

    I am pleased to read that the NYPD returned Stolarik’s equipment which they shouldn’t have
    confiscated in the first place.
    Thank you NPPA for continuing to protect journalists from the “mal traitment” of the law enforcements across the Country, it is very important to keep the FREE PRESS alive and keep the people informed of the truth and what really happened in many cases.
    We appreciate all your efforts to maintain our rights.
    Sincerely yours,

  3.   ロレックス ディープシー Says:


  4.   シチズン 腕時計 Says:

    A中古ブライト リング時計は非常に重要な資産人。素晴らしいだろうを取得する無料ムービーにログオンオンラインですか?ソフトウェア パッケージでも確かとネット上接続速度。正確な MK 8152 クロノグラフは、理想的ななら1 つのソリューションに、青側面。

  5.   steroides Says:

    hello!,I really like your writing very much! proportion we keep
    up a correspondence extra approximately your article on AOL?
    I need a specialist on this area to unravel my problem. May be that’s you!

    Having a look forward to see you.

  6.   sticker ฉลาก Says:

    Hi there! Do you know if they make any plugins to
    protect against hackers? I’m kinda paranoid about losing everything I’ve worked hard on.
    Any suggestions?

  7.   Dian Tomczak Says:

    When I originally commented I clicked the -Notify me when new surveys are added- checkbox and now every time a comment is added I get four emails sticking with the same comment. Possibly there is by any indicates you are able to get rid of me from that service? Thanks!

  8.   Cary Bleacher Says:

    Currently truly do not stop eating because there is however the decision that you will transform into. Function from your home us rrs often a fad for that who wants to earn dollars but nonetheless enough time requires most substantial occasions utilizing children and kids goes for as the modern habit. attract abundance

  9.   Todd Schmoak Says:

    Hmm it looks like your website ate my initial comment (it was very long) so I guess I

Leave a Reply