7th Circuit Court of Appeals Upholds Right to Record in Public

May 8th, 2012 by Mickey Osterreicher

The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit today granted a preliminary injunction, blocking enforcement of the Illinois Eavesdropping statute as it applies to audio recording of police performing “their duties in public places and engaging in public communications audible to persons who witness the events.”

According to 7th Circuit Opinionthe Illinois eavesdropping statute restricts far more speech than necessary to protect legitimate privacy interests; as applied to the facts alleged here, it likely violates the First Amendment’s free speech and free-press guarantees.

The NPPA along with other media groups had submitted an amicus brief in support of the ACLU position, which now aligns with the decision in the First Circuit in Glik v Cunniffe. The 3 judge panel in this case found that “the Illinois eavesdropping statute restricts a medium of expression commonly used for the preservation and communication of information and ideas, thus trig­gering First Amendment scrutiny. Illinois has criminalized the nonconsensual recording of most any oral communica­tion, including recordings of public officials doing the public’s business in public and regardless of whether the recording is open or surreptitious.”

The court did not adopt the Illinois argument that the government’ had an “interest in protecting conversational privacy,” finding instead that “the Illinois eavesdropping statute restricts far more speech than necessary to protect legiti­mate privacy interests; as applied to the facts alleged here, it likely violates the First Amendment’s free-speech and free-press guarantees.”

“In short, the eavesdropping statute restricts a medium of expression—the use of a common instrument of com­munication—and thus an integral step in the speech process. As applied here, it interferes with the gathering and dissemination of information about government officials performing their duties in public. Any way you look at it, the eavesdropping statute burdens speech and press rights and is subject to heightened First Amendment scrutiny.”

Not surprisingly in his dissent , Circuit Judge Richard A. Posner continued the  suppositions and parade-of-horribles that he first articulated during the oral argument in this case last October. Advocating for a reasonable expectation of privacy for police and others when speaking in public he conjectured about how “in many of these encounters the person con­versing with the police officer may be very averse to the conversation’s being broadcast on the evening news or blogged throughout the world.” Once again erroneously seeking to trample on the First Amendment right to record in public in order to protect against the possibility of a perceived right of privacy tort arising should such conversations be published.

Fortunately Judges David F. Hamilton and Diane S. Sykes had the good sense to recognize that “the Illinois eavesdropping statute obliterates the distinction between private and nonprivate by criminalizing all nonconsensual audio recording regardless of whether the communication is private in any sense.” (emphasis in the original).


Posted in Access, ACLU v Alvarez, First Amendment, First Amendment rights, Illinois ACLU, Photographers' Rights, Reasonable Expectation of Privacy, Recording, Recording Police | 14 Comments »

14 Responses to “7th Circuit Court of Appeals Upholds Right to Record in Public”

  1.   Anonymous Says:

    Interesting article. It’s very unfortunate that over the last ten years, the travel industry has had to take on terrorism, SARS, tsunamis, bird flu, swine flu, and also the first ever entire global recession. Through all this the industry has really proven to be effective, resilient and dynamic, finding new ways to deal with misfortune. There are usually fresh troubles and opportunity to which the business must all over again adapt and behave.

  2.   Charissa Coutee Says:

    you’ve an excellent weblog right here! would you wish to make some invite posts on my weblog?

  3.   Lavonda Gochett Says:

    This really answered my problem, thank you!

  4.   Janeen Kirtley Says:

    Somebody essentially assist to make significantly articles I would state. This is the very first time I frequented your website page and to this point? I amazed with the research you made to create this particular submit extraordinary. Excellent task!

  5.   Nowoczesne Systemy ERP Says:

    This really answered my downside, thanks!

  6.   Brian Kanevsky Says:

    fantastic publish, very informative. I wonder why the other specialists of this sector do not notice this. You should continue your writing. I am confident, you have a huge readers’ base already!

  7.   iOS Tworzenie Says:

    I definitely wanted to develop a quick comment to say thanks to you for the great advice you are writing here. My prolonged internet lookup has now been rewarded with extremely good insight to exchange with my neighbours. I ‘d believe that most of us visitors are very endowed to be in a magnificent site with very many lovely people with useful tips and hints. I feel very privileged to have discovered your entire web page and look forward to some more thrilling moments reading here. Thanks again for a lot of things.

  8.   Vanda Spada Says:

    That is the appropriate blog for anyone who wants to search out out about this topic. You notice a lot its nearly hard to argue with you (not that I really would needHaHa). You definitely put a brand new spin on a topic thats been written about for years. Nice stuff, simply great!

  9.   name Says:

    with absolute certainty as Guatemalas if they were mixed in with, say, other Central Americas. Yet all twelve of this month’s samples clearly share certain ,

  10.   Abe Hagmann Says:

    In 1975, in the age of 22, I bought a 73 Malibu, the 1st great car I at any time bought and paid for. As fondly as I bear in mind these days, I don’t have any desire to possess an American car from that era. I’ve owned several GMs, Mopars and Fords. The situations I take pleasure in remembering, although the cars? Not a lot of.

  11.   Kyle Glaviano Says:

    Someone necessarily lend a hand to make seriously posts I would state. This is the first time I frequented your web page and to this point? I amazed with the analysis you made to make this particular put up amazing. Great process!

  12. Says:

    With the “winged wheel” logo now being synonymous with tradition and quality,
    Rotary could now concentrate its efforts on improving
    its technology and promoting its brand. Watch making is an art in its own
    and there are masters in the field out there with wide collections of timepieces that speak about fashion.
    In the 1950s Casio set in motion their first calculator.

  13.   Rose Says:

    That’s why I became interested in buying a silicone watch,
    which led me to the Splash Watch. Jacques Didisheim although pioneered a bright future for the brand,
    his son,Bernard Didisheim did not come to a
    halt because of the achievements ahead of himself. 99, a price reduced to 61% off the normal list price.

  14.   Armand Hytros Says:

    Stunning function. A level of creativity and thought place into every task that really tends to make it come to feel special and crafted appropriately for its viewers.

Leave a Reply