Search

Boston paying $170k for videography arrest

March 27th, 2012 by Alicia Calzada and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Boston Globe is reporting that the City of Boston has paid $170,000 to settle a civil rights lawsuit filed against them after they arrested a man for photographing police activity on the Boston Commons.

The underlying case was the subject of an earlier appellate ruling which held that “peaceful recording of an arrest in a public space that does not interfere with the police officers’ performance of their duties is not reasonably subject to limitation.” Glik v. Cunniffe, 655 F.3d 78, 84 (1st Cir. 2011).

The case began over four years ago, when Simon Glik was walking past the Boston Commons and noticed three police officers arresting a man. An attorney who believed that the officers might be using excessive force, Glik began recording with his cell phone. Police arrested Glik and charged him with, among other things, violations of the wiretap statute. All charges against him were either dropped or dismissed and Glik filed a federal suit alleging that officers violated his civil rights. The officers argued official qualified immunity but the court denied it, and an appellate court upheld the ruling, holding that “a citizen’s right to film government officials, including law enforcement officers, in the discharge of their duties in a public space is a basic, vital, and well-established liberty safeguarded by the First Amendment.” Glik v. Cunniffe, 655 F.3d 78, 85 (1st Cir. 2011).

The Boston Police Department initially defended the officers and in 2008 issued a memo stating that the two officers involved did nothing wrong, but back in January the department stated that the two officers would face discipline and used “ureasonable judgment,” according to the Globe.

See other articles on the case by Massacusetts Lawyers Weekly, ARS Technica, and Carlos Miller’s blog.

Read an earlier NPPA post on the First Circuit decision of Glik v. Cunniffe.

Posted in Boston Police, Cameras, cell phone cameras, First Amendment, Massachusetts ACLU, Newsgathering, Photographers' Rights, photojournalism, Police, Recording, Recording Police, video cameras, Wiretap Law | 12 Comments »



12 Responses to “Boston paying $170k for videography arrest”

  1.   Alli Says:

    Justice is served! The Constitution prevails!

  2.   jeux flash Says:

    Thank you for some other magnificent article. The place else may
    anyone get that kind of information in such a perfect
    means of writing? I have a presentation subsequent
    week, and I am on the look for such info.

  3.   solve recaptcha Says:

    I do trust all the ideas you have introduced
    on your post. They are very convincing and will
    certainly work. Still, the posts are too
    brief for newbies. May just you please prolong them a
    little from subsequent time? Thank you for the post.

  4.   spécialiste de la vente de cigarette électronique et de e-cigarette au meilleur prix Says:

    I’m now not positive the place you’re getting your information, but great topic.
    I must spend some time studying more or figuring out more.
    Thank you for magnificent information I used to be searching for this information for my mission.

  5.   Milo Schlesener Says:

    Thanks for another informative blog. Where else may I am getting that kind of info written in such a perfect method? I have a project that I am simply now operating on, and I have been at the glance out for such information.

  6.   Martine Mellin Says:

    magnificent points altogether, you simply gained a logo new reader. What may you recommend about your submit that you simply made a few days ago? Any sure?|

  7.   Maurita Grava Says:

    Definitely believe that which you said. Your favorite reason seemed to be on the internet the easiest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I definitely get annoyed while people think about worries that they plainly don’t know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top as well as defined out the whole thing without having side-effects, people can take a signal. Will probably be back to get more. Thanks

  8.   Wallace Filipiak Says:

    I truly don

  9.   Velva Patka Says:

    In case you have been injured as a result of a defective IVC Filter, you must contact an experienced attorney practicing in medical malpractice cases, specifically someone with experience in these lawsuits.

  10.   Habibi Says:

    An intriguing dialogue is value comment. I believe that it truly is finest to write much more on this matter, it may possibly not be a taboo topic but typically persons are not enough to speak on such topics. To the next. Cheers

  11.   Habibi Says:

    An interesting discussion is worth comment. I believe which you need to write a lot more on this subject, it might not be a taboo subject but typically individuals are not enough to speak on such topics. To the next. Cheers

  12.   comment pirater un compte facebook avec brutus Says:

    all the time i used to read smaller posts which as well clear their motive, and that
    is also happening with this piece of writing which
    I am reading now.

Leave a Reply