NPPA protests arrest of San Diego Photographer – Investigation Underway

January 18th, 2012 by Alicia Calzada and tagged , , , , , , , , ,

Earlier this week NPPA member and San Diego freelance photojournalists Edward R. Baier was arrested while covering an incident near the San Diego River.

Reports state that Baier was on public property and complied with officers in respecting a perimeter they set up. Yet he was arrested and his camera gear was seized.

The department responded to NPPA almost immediately, with Assistant Chief Boyd Long telling Osterreicher that the equipment would be returned and that an internal investigation had been initiated. Baier’s camera, tapes and other seized equipment were returned to him the next day.

After the incident Baier said, “if it wasn’t for Mickey Osterreicher’s letter from the  NPPA I would not have had my equipment returned to me.” “I am very proud to be a member of an organization the has the legal resources available to its membership at anytime,” he added.

To read the letter sent by NPPA, click here: San Diego Police Letter 01-16-12-1

See also, article here.

Posted in Access, Cameras, confiscated, First Amendment, First Amendment rights, Legal, National Press Photographers Association, News Photography, Photographers' Rights, photojournalism, Public Photography | 2 Comments »

2 Responses to “NPPA protests arrest of San Diego Photographer – Investigation Underway”

  1.   Glenn Zachman Says:

    As an L.A. area Stringer, that curently lives part time in San Diego, I have had time to observe local police officers and they’re interactions with the public as well as a few media. It appears that they have a contempt for members of the media and what they represent. Watch your back and get every interaction on video. When they demand the video, cite CA Evidence code 1070 and say “no”…

  2.   website designing company bangalore Says:

    I must say, as a lot as I enjoyed reading what you had to say, I couldnt help but lose interest after a while. Its as if you had a wonderful grasp on the subject matter, but you forgot to include your readers. Perhaps you should think about this from far more than one angle. Or maybe you shouldnt generalise so considerably. Its better if you think about what others may have to say instead of just going for a gut reaction to the subject. Think about adjusting your own believed process and giving others who may read this the benefit of the doubt.

Leave a Reply