Search

NPPA Objects to PATCO Website Page Equating Photography with Terrorism

January 10th, 2012 by Alicia Calzada and tagged , , , ,

UPDATE: Although the offending language was removed (see below) in response to questions from a reporter for phillymag.com, DRPA spokesperson, Tim Ireland issued a follow-up statement, saying “amateur photographers and members of the general public may be stopped and asked who they are, what they’re doing and why they’re doing it.”

******On 1/18/12 Mickey H. Osterreicher sent a follow-up letter to DRPA President & CEO John J. Matheussen, asserting that photography by itself is not a suspicious activity.

****** As of 1/12/12 the language that NPPA complained about in the very first bullet point, which states, “Individuals observed filming or photographing passing trains, locomotives, freight cars, passenger cars, rail yard operations, tracks, bridges, tunnels, commuter rail trains, subway trains, transit trains, stations and platforms” has been removed from the PATCO website.

NPPA this week voiced its objection to the Port Authority Transit Corporation (PATCO) posting on its website that photography is a suspicious activity. In a strongly worded letter  to Delaware River Port Authority of Pennsylvania and New Jersey (DRPA) Chairman, the Hon. Tom Corbett, NPPA general counsel, Mickey H. Osterreicher, said “on behalf of NPPA and its members, I strongly object to PATCO’s depiction of photography as ‘suspicious’ or somehow being equated to terrorist activities.”  According to its website, DRPA “is a regional transportation agency serving the people of Southeastern Pennsylvania and Southern New Jersey.” It owns and operates the Benjamin Franklin, Walt Whitman, Commodore Barry, and Betsy Ross bridges. PATCO is a DRPA run subsidiary.

At issue is the language contained on the “Safety & Security” page of the PATCO website (http://www.ridepatco.org/safety/suspicious.html). Specifically, the wording at the top of that page entitled “What Should I Consider Suspicious?” on which the very first bullet point states, “Individuals observed filming or photographing passing trains, locomotives, freight cars, passenger cars, rail yard operations, tracks, bridges, tunnels, commuter rail trains, subway trains, transit trains, stations and platforms.”
NPPA has previously pointed out to numerous groups and law enforcement agencies that photography in all its forms (still, film, digital and video) are First Amendment-protected activities and should not be considered suspicious absent articulable facts and circumstances that support the suspicion that the behavior observed is not innocent, but rather reasonably indicative of criminal activity associated with terrorism or other crimes.

According to Osterreicher “the practice by government officials to question, detain and interfere with lawful behavior by photographers under the guise of preventing terrorist activities has become a daily occurrence and has resulted in a significant increase in the harassment and arrest of photographers nationwide.”  The letter went on to say that “the abridgement of a constitutionally protected form of expression because of that erroneous belief is only reinforced by your specific reference to photography as being part of some sinister act or pernicious activity.”  As in other instances NPPA is gravely concerned that by placing the words “individuals observed filming or photographing” at the top of PATCO’s list of activities the public should “consider suspicious” it has unnecessarily and unconstitutionally planted the seed that photography is a distinctly suspect pursuit. NPPA  takes the position that the PATCO web page, targeted at the general public, creates “a climate that chills free speech under the pretext of safety and security.”

To provide a little background into the often unknown and often times overlapping labyrinth of government agencies established to combat terrorism, the Information Sharing Environment (ISE) was established by the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004. According to its website “the Program Manager was granted government wide authority to plan for, oversee the implementation of, and manage the ISE. Click here to learn more about the Background and Authorities of the ISE.”  Language found in the ISE – Suspicious Activity Reporting (SAR) Criteria Guidance table lists and defines “photography” as “taking still or moving pictures of sensitive locations within a facility that have no apparent aesthetic value (e.g., personnel, security camera or guard locations, equipment, systems, emergency evacuation instructions), etc.” NPPA argues that PATCO has broadened even this misplaced definition into one that fails “as a reasonable time, place and manner restriction because it limits far more speech than is necessary to serve a substantial government interest.”

The letter referenced past NPPA advocacy efforts such as working with Amtrak to develop reasonable guidelines concerning photography for both the public and its employees (see: http://tinyurl.com/y8uzseh) and concluded with NPPA’s offer to work with PATCO “to help develop appropriate guidelines and implement proper training in order to avoid these situations” and that  PATCO remove “photography” from its list of suspicious activities.

Copies of the letter were sent to Sean Elliot, NPPA President; U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary, Janet Napolitano; and Ed Barocas,  Legal Director of the NJ ACLU.

Posted in Access, Cameras, First Amendment, First Amendment rights, National Press Photographers Association, News Photography, NPPA, PATCO, photographers, Photographers' Rights, photojournalism, Public Photography, Regulations limiting photography, Suspicious Activity, Terrorism | 10 Comments »



10 Responses to “NPPA Objects to PATCO Website Page Equating Photography with Terrorism”

  1.   luis Says:

    Tell that to the Families of those who died on Sept. 11 ,maybe the first amendment needs to be revised to exclude photos ,if I see someone taking photos of my house or my kids I’m going to question the person to find out what his or hers intentions are call me paranoid or whatever you want I’m going to check !

  2.   Alicia Calzada Says:

    Thanks for writing- there is nothing wrong with you questioning people who take pictures of your kids. The First Amendment forecloses action by the government, not ciitznes. But in order for the media to be able to accurately provide unbiased reporting of transportation systems (government-run operations which are matters of public concern) they must not be subject to constant harassment of the train system. And there is nothing wrong with asking a photographer a question- it is when photography is equated with terrorism that law enforcement start to believe that it might be illegal. Imagine if every time you took a photo of your kids- say as you were getting on a train- you were questioned as a suspected terrorist or detained.

  3.   professional photography vancouver Says:

    I do believe all of the ideas you’ve presented in your post. They’re really convincing and can definitely work. Still, the posts are too short for newbies. Could you please prolong them a little from next time? Thank you for the post.

  4.   Chester Train Station Says:

    It’s actually a cool and helpful piece of information. I am happy that you just shared this useful info with us. Please keep us informed like this. Thanks for sharing.

  5.   Anonymous Says:

    Hey there this is somewhat of off topic but I was wanting to know if blogs use WYSIWYG editors or if you have to manually code with HTML. I’m starting a blog soon but have no coding know-how so I wanted to get advice from someone with experience. Any help would be enormously appreciated!

  6.   Anonymous Says:

    Howdy! I know this is kind of off topic but I was wondering which blog platform are you using for this website? I’m getting fed up of WordPress because I’ve had issues with hackers and I’m looking at options for another platform. I would be awesome if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.

  7.   Anonymous Says:

    Would you be fascinated with exchanging hyperlinks?

  8.   Florida Lock & Key Says:

    Florida Lock & Key 3620 Manatee Ave W Bradenton, FL 34201 (941) 748-5625

  9.   Rufus Khazdozian Says:

    Way too terrible the Joint Commission International hospitals have been not included on this report!

  10.   Dayna Demay Says:

    John L. Smith.

Leave a Reply