Licensing “social media” use

May 25th, 2010 by Alicia Calzada and tagged , , , , , ,

There is an interesting blog post/discussion on about whether or not social media is considered covered by an “internet” usage license. It is a great topic, and really important for photographers to think about. Whenever something is vague in your contract, it might be interpreted differently than you intend, either by a client, or a judge. Neither is a good result. Remember too, that your client is the company, not the person. One quick “downsize” and the person who you have an “understanding” with is no longer there to enforce that understanding.

As interesting as the original post is, be sure to read the comments for some interesting points. The post has responses from photo buyers, whose opinions are likely to be similar to your clients. The comments include solutions from photographers.

In my opinion, one of the most important things to consider in this situation is that if you allow clients to post photos on “social media” websites, the images will be subjected to the terms and conditions of those social media sites. You don’t know what those are, and therefore can’t monitor them or pull your images down if they become too grabby.

Remember just a few weeks ago, we discovered that AFP thinks that any photo posted on Twitter (it was actually TwitPic) is free for the taking (I don’t agree). Does that mean that giving your client the right to post on social media= giving AFP all rights to you picture? Something to think about, and yet another reason why it is important that the Twitter case comes out in favor of the photographer.

There must be a balance. Social media usage is something that will be valuable to clients. I think that you should either clarify that it is a separate charge, or as one commenter suggested, increase your internet usage fee and clarify that it is included. Social media is also a very BROAD term, and applies to many different things out there. Finally, some social media sites allow the person who uploads to select a “creative commons” license, which really does give the farm away. Most social media sites also strip the metadata from your images, creating an instant orphan work.

Some options: 1) Have a internet usage license that excludes social media; 2) increase “internet” price to account for the additional uses that clients will now have; 3) have a “social media” license that specifies the social media sites to be used; 4) request that any images be posted along with specific copyright info; 5) provide a separate set of low resolution files specifically for social media use; 6) stick with the status quo, and let the chips fall where they may (just don’t get mad later).

Either way, be clear about what you intend and what your client expects. That is how you keep your client and stay in business.

Posted in contracts, copyright, Legal, photographers | 9 Comments »

9 Responses to “Licensing “social media” use”

  1.   Arvilla Blankley Says:

    hi!,I like your writing so much! share we communicate more about your article on AOL? I need an expert on this area to solve my problem. Maybe that’s you! Looking forward to see you.

  2.   日内交易加拿大 Says:

    This is really interesting, You are a very skilled blogger. I have joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your excellent post. Also, I’ve shared your web site in my social networks!

  3.   Denae Grecco Says:

    Many thanks for your personal challenge as well as initiatives! These things in your web site is actually fantastic. Also We dramatically recognize your own tips. Personally they are fundamental matters. Nonetheless cheers. Wonderful look over.

  4.   Antione Ulstad Says:

    11. Larcis Ducasse: Rated 98 from the bottle, and 97+ in this tasting. It received 28 points. It seemed more backward than I remember it from several years ago.

  5.   Joesph Says:

    The Nectarine has smooth-slick pores and skin like a Plum. The style is resembling a Peach. The significant distinction is that the Peach has a rough protective skin a prickly fiber that protects the fruit and if not wiped-off can hurt your tongue….

  6.   Anonymous Says:

    Fx trading is the trading of forex in the international trade industry (Fx or Forex) which is a world-wide market for the investing of currency in an goal to make revenue. The overseas trade market establishes the relative price of each forex with respect to yet another forex. The hazards included in forex investing is really large owing to whole lot of unpredictability, but a quantity of traders have created massive sums of funds in foreign exchange buying and selling specifically Monthly bill Lipschitz, George Soros and Stanley Druckenmiller. It is controlled by the forex trading forex investing board getting the requisite jurisdiction.

  7.   produktionsbolag ica Says:

    I love your blog design, did you do this all by yourself or hire someone else to create it?

  8.   Hailey Taccariello Says:

    Easily i am not against what we saying but i have to exclude that you are not valid on this issue. Why in the world man convertd a great deal in course of time? Can’t we just coincide on all causes? We comparable condition in our business.Decoding the issue want some concentrated analysis

  9.   Loreta Mckeane Says:

    Mr. Elliott,Letters via USPS sounds so novel in the internet age whether or not it is just one letter produced for many, but it doesn’t sound like a pen-pal relationship. Can an individual write back on the author of the letter?

Leave a Reply